How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2001 UV Doses of Americans
Dianne E. Godar, Steven P. Wengraitis, Jack Shreffler, David H. Sliney
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The UV doses of Americans were never measured, but are needed for assessing the risks of UV-related health effects. We calculated these doses using a novel approach. The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS) recorded the activity profiles of 9386 Americans over 24 months to assess their exposure to environmental pollutants, one of which is UV radiation. NHAPS used randomized telephone interviews to get their previous day's minute-by-minute activities. From NHAPS we extracted only the outdoor-daylight data of the northern and southern indoor workers (95%), stratifying by season, sex and age (0–21, 22–40, 41–59 and 60 years) to find the average time Americans spend outdoors. Knowing the total daylight time and that while outdoors Americans are exposed to about 30% of the available solar UV (on a horizontal plane), we calculated their percent ambients. The average American's percent ambients are 2.6 and 2.5% for northern and southern females, respectively, and 3.5 and 3.6% for northern and southern males, respectively. Men over 40 years of age have the highest ambients (4%). From their ambients we calculated their annual doses using seasonal averages of UV measurements taken daily for over 2 years by EPA Brewer spectrophotometers located in four quadrants of the United States: Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA; Bozeman, MT and Riverside, CA. The average erythemal UV doses of Americans are about 25 000 J/m2/year, 22 000 for females and 28 000 for males, or 33 000 J/m2/year including a conservative continental U.S. vacation (7800 J/m2). Thus, we can now assess the risks of UV-related health effects for Americans.

Dianne E. Godar, Steven P. Wengraitis, Jack Shreffler, and David H. Sliney "UV Doses of Americans," Photochemistry and Photobiology 73(6), 621-629, (1 June 2001). https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2001)073<0621:UDOA>2.0.CO;2
Received: 11 December 2000; Accepted: 1 March 2001; Published: 1 June 2001
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top